It seems that Maryland do-gooders have no fear in apprehending bank robbers as long as the robber is unarmed.
Now, what would the outcome have been if the robber had a gun? No such citizen bravery would have been seen. And what would have been the outcome if the robber was armed, but so were the citizens? I would imagine that, considering that this story is coming from NBC4 in Washington, that the author would be castigating the same citizens for being "vigilantes."
Tell me I'm wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment